On 10/01/21 22:50, Stijn Segers wrote:
Hi Sven,

Op zondag 10 januari 2021 om 22u28 schreef Sven Roederer <[email protected]>:
Am Samstag, 9. Januar 2021, 12:28:31 CET schrieb Stijn Segers:
 > @@ -228,6 +229,7 @@ do_save_conffiles() {
 >
 > if [ "$SAVE_INSTALLED_PKGS" -eq 1 ]; then
 > echo "${INSTALLED_PACKAGES}" >> "$CONFFILES"
 > +               echo "${SERVICE_STATUS}" >> "$CONFFILES"
 > mkdir -p "$ETCBACKUP_DIR"

 Am I reading this correctly and is this only keeping track of service
 status if you tell sysupgrade to save packages? What's the rationale
 behind that?

 I have a personal build with all packages preinstalled, so I don't need
 that. Would like to keep track of service status though. Can those two
 things be entangled?


Stijn,

my intention was to not change the current behavior by default, so an extra switch or extending an existing switch looked like the way. I've choosen the lazy one, based on "when the user is storing the packages-list, he is for sure
interested in the services".
But I'm happy to add a separate switch to sysupgrade. Any preference of the
letter? What about using "-s"?

Sven

Yes, that's still free and the most intuitive I think.

Thanks!

Stijn


Since we (me, Andre Heider and Paul Spooren) are discussing/asking about enabling this by default, do you have any opinion on that?

-Alberto

_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Reply via email to