Am Montag, 11. Januar 2021, 03:59:51 CET schrieb Alberto Bursi: > On 10/01/21 22:40, Sven Roederer wrote: > > Am Sonntag, 10. Januar 2021, 09:47:27 CET schrieb Andre Heider: > >>> Same. I would personally like this as default sysupgrade procedure, as > >>> that's what makes most sense imho. > >>> If I have disabled a service it makes sense that after a firmware > >>> upgrade it remains disabled. > >> > >> Seconded. > >> > >> Use case: Two identical routers for which I build a single image > >> including all the packages I required. One has a workround to disable > >> dnsmasq in rc.local, because it's always enabled after a sysupgrade and > >> acts as a additional interfering dhcp server (I can probably configure > >> it otherwise, but I don't require that instance at all). > > > > That's quite the situation we have here with our common images. Users > > during initial setup getting some services disabled based on their > > choices. As the services shall remain inside the image (reconfiguration) > > the services-state should be kept. > > > > Sven > > I don't understand what you are saying here. Can you explain? >
Alberto, it's just the story why the current behavior annoyed me. Same as you wrote: a common image for multiple routers which have all relevant services installed.during setup our wizard disables some services, which should remain in this state. Sven _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
