Maciej Żenczykowski wrote: >> Â and to pick up on a post >> of mine from some time back, is there any interest in a short list of >> what i once described as openwrt-friendly routers? Â that is, rather >> than a lengthy list of supported/sort of supported/minimally supported >> routers, it would be handy to have a list of, say, at most 5 routers >> that work splendidly well with openwrt. >> >> Â and by works well, the wish list: >> >> Â * runs the latest 2.6 kernel >> Â * fully-functioning GUI >> Â * wireless out of the box >> Â * at least one USB 2.0 port, better if two >> >> at the moment, which easily available routers fit the bill? >> > > Yes, please! > > I would suggest a list of hw that is just plain fully supported. > > For example, I need to buy an ADSL2+ something-or-other (preferably > modem, but it looks like there are none, so next choice is bridge, but > it seems like almost everything has at least a switch built-in, > etc...) . I don't want something I can't hack-into-submission. After > _much_ research I'm still undecided. > As such what we should have is some sort of table of fully supported > > h/w (everything works) that is thus by definition not flaky, along > with h/w specs, ie. > - flash size > - ram size > - cpu bogospeed > - # of usb links (host) > - # of usb links (device) > - # of ethernet ports (and what speed: 100mbit? gigabit?) > - wireless (802.11a?b?g?n? dual-band?) > - (A)DSL(/2/2+)? > - notes (serial? jtag? debugability, recoverability? opensource fully? > 2.6 kernel?) > > Basically a table which answers the ever-present question: I know > what h/w features I want, I know I want to run OpenWrt, which H/W > should I buy? > >
Could you post this suggestion on -devel mailing list - please ;--) _______________________________________________ openwrt-users mailing list openwrt-users@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-users
