We have noticed any issues with chatme.im so far.

On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Thomas Camaran <[email protected]> wrote:

> hi, with chatme.im all ok?
>
>
> 2013/2/13 aszlig <[email protected]>
>
>> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 09:48:59AM +0100, Per Gustafsson wrote:
>> > I work with Google's chat service, and we are seeing lots of spammy
>> invites
>> > from users on various federated domains, including jabberes.org,
>> jabber.se,
>> > jabber-hosting.com and jabber.org. Have you noted an elevated amount of
>> > sccount creation etc., and is there anything you can do about it in that
>> > case, otherwise we will have to institute very tight limits of invites
>> per
>> > day being sent from federated domains.
>>
>> Here I've got the same problems as well (aszlig.net, headcounter.org,
>> no-icq.org, noicq.org - not yet listed at xmpp.net since the rework) and
>> i'm going to disable new registrations as soon as the load is low
>> enough. The main target of these massive spammy subscribes is gmail.com
>> and it's quite hard to track them down without "accidentally" locking
>> out real users.
>>
>> My second step would be to reenable registrations and only allow
>> verified users to use S2S. But I'm not sure about how to do this for
>> every single user (maybe some kind of WoT within the local network?).
>>
>> So, any idea about how to mitigate this without forcing too much
>> restrictions on real users (like for example I'd want to avoid
>> captchas)?
>>
>> a!
>> --
>> aszlig
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>> iF4EAREIAAYFAlEbtEIACgkQ0OvQ7IwtyWHDvwD/bdpv4M//fOBDVpiaV6sQjMQm
>> gRCbQvTEaramaFj+X/oBAKLo1zCVaE3sOuyagWhnlcn5kQP9nwJPW1BaTvXcb6p7
>> =oXrV
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to