-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 5/22/13 9:15 AM, Philipp Hancke wrote: > On Wed, 22 May 2013, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> On the other hand, not needing to interoperate with Google Talk >> might free us to more aggressively work on network security >> improvements. I say let's take this as an opportunity rather than >> a disappointment. > > +1. I wonder what the correlation between "gtalk doesn't do TLS" > and "businesses don't allow federation with gtalk" is.
I suspect that the correlation is very low. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRnOFTAAoJEOoGpJErxa2pPzsP/2z5WFIuL/BwaZTCa0l+inQW UbDXyzgNbPv/5YFSoq6FswKYaSvOhJLw5b8wMngTCdmYgGO5/qP0awXhHuYH36gu JnsadyuN/2yAA/X2rAqZ+jNyy00P9yH4qwoEKIkMj8jl6VjG1KtulkRp0fPKY6ll dQldtIYE68hwLrShuFhQ4gONarYax6mOT8cbGBVfVRMnwboNZXSy9DlQZVqhYKR1 DRFVFJh3iYVf6813JkSxOukf3wL/gd3VmTMol4BnDD3Ory7y7L7xgfgZNhinF7sY Ha3vekLpxu3kBlu78HSsVPf5Qr146LcBtpsUSNlvjNFy4V15k6cfRyhnRmrPa6Ew RvrODUl/7UYOWih8zGP2HsOSUOq6STngVUEoomdwoirgVSURPI/wJIABRGkn5sxK rAHAWw25npTQmtocSbFNzGdhmRLxXxaGCg9Vcua5E7uK1yWFfghm1FN1XHECTIPw 4aMHONEWvrCr1L23dS6yMVrjEEBbMpKmi22sHVT3YlY7UDmOZVu2whafw1ufBNZs bptv7A4YH9FW8sPDoOfKA1QDiRJwrgMBM0pJSXS5bNkuVNtdplGPVOJMLrR0UXeJ h91r6X3/hoVHc1fzX0wdHeFtnl+Gl6EmuG8KUjt/W6mUPyCoAW8KEOcYlfEgTIs+ IvvhADkIjt20iYOl7+uh =IR1a -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
