On 5/22/13 1:09 PM, Philipp Hancke wrote: > Am 22.05.2013 20:30, schrieb Peter Saint-Andre: >>> So the protocol isn't as rich as they want... guess they haven't >>> understood the "x" part in xmpp. >> >> Well, I see no reason for us to act the jilted lover. :-) >> We had an on-and-off affair (2005-2013) but XMPP predated Google Talk >> and now we >> start the post-Google years. > > Well, xmpp has moved alot since 2005. caps, pubsub, pep, carbons, > s2s-tls, compression, jingle... gtalk hasn't. So breaking up was a > reasonable thing to do.
There's a song in there somewhere. ;-)
