-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 5/22/13 12:27 PM, Philipp Hancke wrote: > Am 22.05.2013 18:40, schrieb Peter Saint-Andre: >> I think it was a bit over-the-top for Chee Chew to claim that >> the "majority" of the server-to-server connectivity to the Google >> Talk service was established by "organizations or individuals >> looking to bombard Google Talk users with chat spam". > > https://developers.google.com/events/io/sessions/331838045 at > 56:00 with the exact quote at 57:30. > > So the protocol isn't as rich as they want... guess they haven't > understood the "x" part in xmpp.
Well, I see no reason for us to act the jilted lover. :-) We had an on-and-off affair (2005-2013) but XMPP predated Google Talk and now we start the post-Google years. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRnQ7jAAoJEOoGpJErxa2py6sQAKVSg92NbnZV+x2KRfokpBpb FvaYJqCTvi/QDW1Gjrbp9rDbSe9V2wy5Z/RVXlzHYgBu+PuuyOFq0kzwpowAVqFa d/YFwxsE+JP2FCTehkaTx+mA6zHKtgWWqGDnJfnaSXWkn+bYPGuoTtSwzQLH/j8e d8PHAL5+AIOa4Xmh270WGvWG9M4tDoZBHFLFf7C9Z1EqweMt2w0K5MnolAESgkmr Re/z1WEFRqqLj0lQLNjApgc47H0JyDeTk3ligjwg+R9YsClhMhOFIAlBPUsy9rg8 8uMEIUePJxCy8MeSZ0AHFRLB5BpUb9d3RTg9t1av3g1dVFiMnGQ4vUHQSdQ46Ykt m4OAPYtJ7tVMQLFRyxJrhHdnUfcpqQ+l+qrFE9gNOIWqMxpgJwLHay89R8wpgNrr 5L14C6h18sZC36wJRhwVRz4pr0OPwwIKnqVeLeLXlJ0YntDtRTOS+bmbTnlfgwPR PIZJ9Za/nkvS4lEUvQRXC+Xd8StQfQ/ehW3JY9pS2uhobrOmWKin/3Q/vz96NBiF BJWOFPf/ydtk7YPhpclFF0xxDBPupYR3Uj9Cg6ETNopE5XdvvcfWuC521Fm2k6te WGU6pD9j7bdRTVugjjF6YSOj52zaUoJhPqPQfPa46YIAhPy5qwkj0mnG54e0MYma AXAaCf5MaLwtr+39ICc/ =aXQH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
