On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 2:20 AM, Dave Cridland <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Justin Uberti <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> That seems like an overly cynical assessment of the situation. Speaking
>> as an individual, it is sad that spammers were more willing to adopt XMPP
>> than other IM networks, but so it goes.
>>
>
> I'm not sure sufficient information exists in one place to make a
> statement like that. If it does, I've certainly never seen it.
>
>
I just realized my statement could be parsed 2 different ways. To be clear: it
is sad that spammers were more willing to adopt XMPP* than other IM
networks were willing to*. Believe me, we tried.

Reply via email to