Actually we are compiling and linking against 1.45 on Red Hat 5 these days. However, it seems like Red Hat 6 ships with version 1.41. Hence, version >= 1.41 is unproblematic from my end. Any larger version and we need to discuss how to support it (static linking to avoid dependency issues or out-of-tree custom install of boost like we now do for Red Hat 5). Joakim, feel free to share your thoughts.
Cheers, Alf -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roland Kaufmann Sent: 15. november 2013 15:04 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [OPM] Boost versions On 2013-11-15 12:43, Joakim Hove wrote: > The community as a whole decides which boost version to for; and how > to relate to the Boost fs question At some point we must switch anyway; maybe this is the time to bump up to boost >= 1.44 (there is even a package for that in EPEL5, and a PPA for Lucid backports, so it is accessible). > Of course we can fiddle with cmake+++ to ensure that the opm-parser > works with boost version 1.39 If it is desired that OPM should still work with 1.39, I think that the best way to do that is to create a small layer that encapsulates the differences and then: #include <boost/version.hpp> #if BOOST_VERSION >= 144000 /* boost::filesystem version 3 */ #else /* boost::filesystem version 2 */ #endif not that I think that is a good solution, though. -- Roland. _______________________________________________ Opm mailing list [email protected] http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm ------------------------------------------------------------------- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you _______________________________________________ Opm mailing list [email protected] http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm
