Actually we are compiling and linking against 1.45 on Red Hat 5 these days. However, it seems like Red Hat 6 ships with version 1.41. Hence, version >= 1.41 is unproblematic from my end. Any larger version and we need to discuss how to support it (static linking to avoid dependency issues or out-of-tree custom install of boost like we now do for Red Hat 5). Joakim, feel free to share your thoughts.
You write "version >= 1.41 is unproblematic from .."; but I guess you mean "version <= 1.41 is unprob..."? Anyway in my opinion version 1.41 is quite pointless, there is boost filesystem tripwire set out between the versions 1.44 - 1.48 which must overcome at one point, so upgrading to 1.41 is in my opinion quite pointless. Seen from Statoil I feel that the current boost installation in common area /project/res works perfectly fine, and I fully expect that to continue to work after an upgrade to RedHat6. ------------------------------------------------------------------- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you
_______________________________________________ Opm mailing list [email protected] http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm
