>>> Sounds like a good plan. In the not-so-distant future we might >>> consider renaming opm-parser -> opm-eclipse?
>To avoid the wrath of Schlumberger, it's probably a good idea not to do that... That might be a point. >I agree that in the long run supporting/creating a more sane format makes >quite a bit of sense and the name of the parser module should be more generic >>for this reason. Though I'm not sure whether the current data structures in >opm-parser are a too good fit for something other than Eclipse, mainly because >>they have been designed to cope with the idiosyncrasies of the eclipse file >format. Nevertheless they're probably a good starting point. I tend to agree here - the current parser datastructures are carefully tailored to the Eclipse personality. Joakim ------------------------------------------------------------------- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you _______________________________________________ Opm mailing list [email protected] http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm
