On 12/15/2014 05:56 PM, Joakim Hove wrote: >> I'd just like to pitch in one more consideration: do we really need to roll >> our own logging implementation? Wouldn't boost's logging library be enough? >> It has capabilities such as multiple backends, and is far less for us to >> maintain. > Yes - that might be the best solution; although I thought it would be quite > fun to implement the logging ....
True, but I can imagine it makes troubleshooting and debugging less un-fun with a more tested logging solution.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Opm mailing list [email protected] http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm
