On 12/15/2014 06:48 PM, Andreas Lauser wrote: > > I suppose this depends on whether you consider boost as a stop-gap measure > for > stuff which is not yet available in the oldest supported compiler or if you > would like to use it as much as possible. Or some other third-party library. Point is, I'm not sure if it's ever worth spending much time implementing, testing and verifying a logger when there are plenty of good, free libraries available.
> (I'd vote for the first option, we had our fair share of > boost-related troubles already and logging is not soo terribly > complicated...) Maybe not, but concurrency, efficiency and correctness is. There could be some compelling argument to why we need our own, but I can't think of one from the top of my head. (And if we do roll one, I would rather see a monadic logger or something. Better than a singleton anyways)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Opm mailing list [email protected] http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm
