Hi, On Monday 15 December 2014 17:54:15 Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote: > On 12/14/2014 09:56 PM, Joakim Hove wrote: > > earlier this autumn Andreas submitted a ParserLog class which has been > > used in the Parser for some time. I would now like to promote this to a > > general logging facility for OPM. I have thought quite a lot about it, > > but not implemented much[1]. I will share my thoughts below, and hope > > > you will comment: > I'd just like to pitch in one more consideration: do we really need to > roll our own logging implementation? Wouldn't boost's logging library be > enough? It has capabilities such as multiple backends, and is far less > for us to maintain.
I suppose this depends on whether you consider boost as a stop-gap measure for
stuff which is not yet available in the oldest supported compiler or if you
would like to use it as much as possible. (I'd vote for the first option, we
had our fair share of boost-related troubles already and logging is not soo
terribly complicated...)
cheers
Andreas
--
the unix philosophy: do 90% of one thing, and barely do it adequately
-- Adam Jackson
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Opm mailing list [email protected] http://www.opm-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opm
