Hi Tim,

Sorry I missed this discussion, is there any updates related to applying this 
configuration on LF pod?
On LF POD2 we currently observe problems with dpdk, and I thought that it could 
be related.

Thanks,
Michal
> On 29 Aug 2016, at 20:00, Frank Brockners (fbrockne) <fbroc...@cisco.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Tim,
> 
> +1 on the config change. 
> 
> Background: If one wants to switch to Rx scatter mode for 1 queue or use more 
> than 1 RQ, one really does have to configure on the VNIC 2x the number needed 
> by the DPDK app. There is no way around this in the current implementation 
> and is the way Rx scatter works on the VIC, where Rx Scatter spill-over 
> buffers are on a 2nd RQ .  Hence the general advice is to configure 2x the 
> number of RQs needed. This will also be reflected in the next revision of the 
> ENIC driver documentation. Longer term, there is a plan to eliminate the 2nd 
> RQ in general (not just for 1 RQ) when Rx scatter is disabled but this is 
> probably happening post the 16.11 DPDK release.
> 
> Frank
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fds-dev-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
> [mailto:fds-dev-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Tim Rozet
> Sent: Montag, 29. August 2016 18:17
> To: infra-steer...@lists.opnfv.org
> Cc: Gregory Elkinbard <gelkinb...@mirantis.com>; Sean Chandler (sechandl) 
> <secha...@cisco.com>; fds-...@lists.opnfv.org; OPNFV Tech 
> <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
> Subject: [Fds-dev] Configuring LF POD with 2 RQs on VIC profiles
> 
> Hi,
> We need to configure 2 RQs on VIC profiles in the UCS manager for DPDK to 
> work.  From what I understand we can make the configuration change and it 
> won't take effect until the blades are rebooted.  For Apex, we need POD 1 to 
> have this configuration for FDIO/and OVS DPDK to daily jobs to pass.  Before 
> I make the change, just want to make sure no one is against it.  Also, do you 
> want me to make the same configuration change for LF POD2 for Fuel?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tim Rozet
> Red Hat SDN Team
> 
> _______________________________________________
> fds-dev mailing list
> fds-...@lists.opnfv.org
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/fds-dev
> _______________________________________________
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Reply via email to