Hi JB,

Do we have any instructions in the OPS4j community so I can perform the 
release myself? We really need the 1.8.6 release ASAP!

Thank you.

On Monday, 20 June 2016 19:10:19 UTC+2, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> Hey, any updates on this?
>
> On 6 June 2016 at 17:18, Matt Sicker <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> wrote:
>
>> Even better!
>>
>> On 6 June 2016 at 16:52, <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote:
>>
>>> The OSGi import issues following the Logback 1.1.7 upgrades are now 
>>> fixed. So please stick with Logback 1.1.7 for the 1.8.6 release.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>>
>>> On Monday, 6 June 2016 19:41:06 UTC+1, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Agree, even if I don't like that much, it makes sense.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 8:36:51 PM UTC+2, Matt Sicker wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> So should we stick with Logback 1.1.2 and Log4j 2.3 for the 1.8.x 
>>>>> release? That makes the most sense.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6 June 2016 at 13:31, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for the update. I'm busy with Karaf 3.0.7 (and other Karaf 
>>>>>> subprojects) release preparation. I will tackle pax-logging just after.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 8:29:56 PM UTC+2, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, it turns out that the upgrade from Logback 1.1.2 => 1.1.7 was 
>>>>>>> not as easy as I expected. In between, the developers at Logback 
>>>>>>> introduced 
>>>>>>> dependencies on these additional 
>>>>>>> packages: org.slf4j.event, org.codehaus.groovy.transform. Obviously the 
>>>>>>> Groovy one can be marked as optional; I'm checking the upstream source 
>>>>>>> to 
>>>>>>> understand when and how o.slf4j.event is used.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thursday, 2 June 2016 15:14:26 UTC+1, Matt Sicker wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'd prefer to downgrade to 2.3 in 1.8.6, then by the time we get 
>>>>>>>> 1.9.0, log4j 2.6.1 should be released.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2 June 2016 at 08:46, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Basically, we want to avoid to break backward compability on minor 
>>>>>>>>> version. It's unfortunately what we did in 1.8.6.
>>>>>>>>> So, we have to:
>>>>>>>>> 1. Or downgrade to log4j 2.3 to still support Java 6
>>>>>>>>> 2. Or remove log4j 2 support in pax-logging 1.8.x, and create new 
>>>>>>>>> major branch 1.9 with log4j 2 support.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 3:43:05 PM UTC+2, Matt Sicker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Wait, do you want Java 6 or 7 compatibility in 1.8.6? If it's 6, 
>>>>>>>>>> we can downgrade log4j to 2.3. If it's 7, then it can be the latest 
>>>>>>>>>> version.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 1 June 2016 at 23:12, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The purpose is:
>>>>>>>>>>> - remove log4j2 support in pax-logging 1.8.6 and go back to 
>>>>>>>>>>> Java7 compatibility
>>>>>>>>>>> - release pax-logging 1.9.0 with log4j2 and Java8 only compliant
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 8:28:40 PM UTC+2, Matt Sicker 
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Same for upgrading log4j to 2.6. Should get it all done in a 
>>>>>>>>>>>> single release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1 June 2016 at 12:08, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> yes, it's on my TODO for next week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 7:00:30 PM UTC+2, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey awesome people,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just upgraded Logback from 1.1.2 to 1.1.7 in master. Would 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it be possible to make a release of pax-logging 1.8.6?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Raúl.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --- 
>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from 
>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>> ------------------
>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --- 
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> ------------------
>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --- 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>> -- 
>>> ------------------
>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] <javascript:>
>>>
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Matt Sicker <[email protected] <javascript:>>
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Matt Sicker <[email protected] <javascript:>>
>

-- 
-- 
------------------
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected]

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to