Correct, I meant Java7 (not Java8). On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 4:18:32 PM UTC+2, Matt Sicker wrote: > > I thought the problem was that it required Java 7, not 8. None of the > pax-logging dependencies require Java 8. > > On 6 September 2016 at 09:16, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jeanbapti...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> We discussed while ago to a Java version change we did on Pax Logging >> 1.8.x: this version requires Java8 whereas it was supposed to work with >> Java6 as well. >> >> So, what I propose is to release 1.8.6 asap and prepare the rollback of >> Java8 requirement. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> >> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 3:31:00 PM UTC+2, ra...@evosent.com >> wrote: >>> >>> As far as I can see, releasing 1.8.6 can be really quick – and it's long >>> overdue. It's basically releasing the master branch......... >>> >>> 1.9.0 will be a bit more complicated – as it'll require maven plugin >>> upgrades and heavy testing. >>> >>> I don't think we should tackle both things at the same time. There's not >>> even a branch for 1.9.0, and no work done towards it as far as I can see. >>> >>> If you can make the 1.8.6 release today – it will be greatly >>> appreciated, JB! >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 14:52:51 UTC+2, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I'm preparing the branches for the two releases: 1.8.6 and 1.9.0 (due >>>> to the Java version change). >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 2:44:00 PM UTC+2, ra...@evosent.com >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi JB, >>>>> >>>>> Do we have any instructions in the OPS4j community so I can perform >>>>> the release myself? We really need the 1.8.6 release ASAP! >>>>> >>>>> Thank you. >>>>> >>>>> On Monday, 20 June 2016 19:10:19 UTC+2, Matt Sicker wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hey, any updates on this? >>>>>> >>>>>> On 6 June 2016 at 17:18, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Even better! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6 June 2016 at 16:52, <ra...@evosent.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The OSGi import issues following the Logback 1.1.7 upgrades are now >>>>>>>> fixed. So please stick with Logback 1.1.7 for the 1.8.6 release. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Monday, 6 June 2016 19:41:06 UTC+1, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Agree, even if I don't like that much, it makes sense. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 8:36:51 PM UTC+2, Matt Sicker wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So should we stick with Logback 1.1.2 and Log4j 2.3 for the 1.8.x >>>>>>>>>> release? That makes the most sense. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 6 June 2016 at 13:31, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>>>>>> jeanbapti...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the update. I'm busy with Karaf 3.0.7 (and other >>>>>>>>>>> Karaf subprojects) release preparation. I will tackle pax-logging >>>>>>>>>>> just >>>>>>>>>>> after. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 8:29:56 PM UTC+2, ra...@evosent.com >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Well, it turns out that the upgrade from Logback 1.1.2 => 1.1.7 >>>>>>>>>>>> was not as easy as I expected. In between, the developers at >>>>>>>>>>>> Logback >>>>>>>>>>>> introduced dependencies on these additional >>>>>>>>>>>> packages: org.slf4j.event, org.codehaus.groovy.transform. >>>>>>>>>>>> Obviously the >>>>>>>>>>>> Groovy one can be marked as optional; I'm checking the upstream >>>>>>>>>>>> source to >>>>>>>>>>>> understand when and how o.slf4j.event is used. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, 2 June 2016 15:14:26 UTC+1, Matt Sicker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd prefer to downgrade to 2.3 in 1.8.6, then by the time we >>>>>>>>>>>>> get 1.9.0, log4j 2.6.1 should be released. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2 June 2016 at 08:46, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>>>>>>>>> jeanbapti...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Basically, we want to avoid to break backward compability on >>>>>>>>>>>>>> minor version. It's unfortunately what we did in 1.8.6. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, we have to: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Or downgrade to log4j 2.3 to still support Java 6 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Or remove log4j 2 support in pax-logging 1.8.x, and create >>>>>>>>>>>>>> new major branch 1.9 with log4j 2 support. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 3:43:05 PM UTC+2, Matt Sicker >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wait, do you want Java 6 or 7 compatibility in 1.8.6? If >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's 6, we can downgrade log4j to 2.3. If it's 7, then it can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be the latest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1 June 2016 at 23:12, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jeanbapti...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The purpose is: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - remove log4j2 support in pax-logging 1.8.6 and go back to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java7 compatibility >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - release pax-logging 1.9.0 with log4j2 and Java8 only >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compliant >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 8:28:40 PM UTC+2, Matt Sicker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Same for upgrading log4j to 2.6. Should get it all done in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a single release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1 June 2016 at 12:08, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jeanbapti...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yes, it's on my TODO for next week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 7:00:30 PM UTC+2, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ra...@evosent.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey awesome people, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just upgraded Logback from 1.1.2 to 1.1.7 in master. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would it be possible to make a release of pax-logging 1.8.6? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Raúl. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from it, send an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from it, send an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from >>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>> send an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>>>>> >>>>> -- >> -- >> ------------------ >> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "OPS4J" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com <javascript:>> >
-- -- ------------------ OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
