I don't think this project should be accommodating of the minimal minority who still run JDK6 – which is end-of-life since 2012 – and, as a consequence, forcing old versions on the rest of the world.
If anything, users still clinging to JDK6 should understand they cannot get the latest kid on the block, and should settle with a legacy Pax Logging version. Don't you think? Cheers. On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 16:23:46 UTC+2, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Correct, I meant Java7 (not Java8). > > On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 4:18:32 PM UTC+2, Matt Sicker wrote: >> >> I thought the problem was that it required Java 7, not 8. None of the >> pax-logging dependencies require Java 8. >> >> On 6 September 2016 at 09:16, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> We discussed while ago to a Java version change we did on Pax Logging >>> 1.8.x: this version requires Java8 whereas it was supposed to work with >>> Java6 as well. >>> >>> So, what I propose is to release 1.8.6 asap and prepare the rollback of >>> Java8 requirement. >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 3:31:00 PM UTC+2, [email protected] >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> As far as I can see, releasing 1.8.6 can be really quick – and it's >>>> long overdue. It's basically releasing the master branch......... >>>> >>>> 1.9.0 will be a bit more complicated – as it'll require maven plugin >>>> upgrades and heavy testing. >>>> >>>> I don't think we should tackle both things at the same time. There's >>>> not even a branch for 1.9.0, and no work done towards it as far as I can >>>> see. >>>> >>>> If you can make the 1.8.6 release today – it will be greatly >>>> appreciated, JB! >>>> >>>> Thank you. >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 14:52:51 UTC+2, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I'm preparing the branches for the two releases: 1.8.6 and 1.9.0 (due >>>>> to the Java version change). >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 2:44:00 PM UTC+2, [email protected] >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi JB, >>>>>> >>>>>> Do we have any instructions in the OPS4j community so I can perform >>>>>> the release myself? We really need the 1.8.6 release ASAP! >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Monday, 20 June 2016 19:10:19 UTC+2, Matt Sicker wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey, any updates on this? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6 June 2016 at 17:18, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Even better! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 6 June 2016 at 16:52, <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The OSGi import issues following the Logback 1.1.7 upgrades are >>>>>>>>> now fixed. So please stick with Logback 1.1.7 for the 1.8.6 release. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Monday, 6 June 2016 19:41:06 UTC+1, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Agree, even if I don't like that much, it makes sense. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 8:36:51 PM UTC+2, Matt Sicker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So should we stick with Logback 1.1.2 and Log4j 2.3 for the >>>>>>>>>>> 1.8.x release? That makes the most sense. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 6 June 2016 at 13:31, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the update. I'm busy with Karaf 3.0.7 (and other >>>>>>>>>>>> Karaf subprojects) release preparation. I will tackle pax-logging >>>>>>>>>>>> just >>>>>>>>>>>> after. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 8:29:56 PM UTC+2, [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, it turns out that the upgrade from Logback 1.1.2 => >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.1.7 was not as easy as I expected. In between, the developers >>>>>>>>>>>>> at Logback >>>>>>>>>>>>> introduced dependencies on these additional >>>>>>>>>>>>> packages: org.slf4j.event, org.codehaus.groovy.transform. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Obviously the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Groovy one can be marked as optional; I'm checking the upstream >>>>>>>>>>>>> source to >>>>>>>>>>>>> understand when and how o.slf4j.event is used. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, 2 June 2016 15:14:26 UTC+1, Matt Sicker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd prefer to downgrade to 2.3 in 1.8.6, then by the time we >>>>>>>>>>>>>> get 1.9.0, log4j 2.6.1 should be released. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2 June 2016 at 08:46, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Basically, we want to avoid to break backward compability on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minor version. It's unfortunately what we did in 1.8.6. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, we have to: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Or downgrade to log4j 2.3 to still support Java 6 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Or remove log4j 2 support in pax-logging 1.8.x, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> create new major branch 1.9 with log4j 2 support. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 3:43:05 PM UTC+2, Matt Sicker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wait, do you want Java 6 or 7 compatibility in 1.8.6? If >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's 6, we can downgrade log4j to 2.3. If it's 7, then it can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be the latest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1 June 2016 at 23:12, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The purpose is: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - remove log4j2 support in pax-logging 1.8.6 and go back >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to Java7 compatibility >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - release pax-logging 1.9.0 with log4j2 and Java8 only >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compliant >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 8:28:40 PM UTC+2, Matt >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sicker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Same for upgrading log4j to 2.6. Should get it all done >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in a single release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1 June 2016 at 12:08, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yes, it's on my TODO for next week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 7:00:30 PM UTC+2, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey awesome people, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just upgraded Logback from 1.1.2 to 1.1.7 in master. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would it be possible to make a release of pax-logging >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8.6? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Raúl. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from it, send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from it, send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from it, send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from >>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>> -- >>> ------------------ >>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] >>> >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "OPS4J" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >> > -- -- ------------------ OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
