I did Pax Logging 1.8.6 release. I'm preparing the announcement and update on wiki.
Regards JB On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 4:48:55 PM UTC+2, [email protected] wrote: > > Actually, this only affected the pax-logging-log4j2 module, right? > > What prevents these users from running pax-logging-api 1.8.5 with > pax-logging-log4j2 with 1.8.1? > > Our OSGi import version ranges are pretty lax: [0.9.5,2.0.0). > > Cheers, > Raúl. > > On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 16:34:22 UTC+2, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> >> Agree, but not on a minor release. Pax Logging 1.8.1 worked on Java6 and >> we broke this on 1.8.5, which is unfortunate (it should have been a 1.9.0 >> at that time). >> >> It's not a big deal, but some users complained. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 4:31:27 PM UTC+2, [email protected] >> wrote: >>> >>> I don't think this project should be accommodating of the minimal >>> minority who still run JDK6 – which is end-of-life since 2012 – and, as a >>> consequence, forcing old versions on the rest of the world. >>> >>> If anything, users still clinging to JDK6 should understand they cannot >>> get the latest kid on the block, and should settle with a legacy Pax >>> Logging version. >>> >>> Don't you think? >>> >>> Cheers. >>> >>> On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 16:23:46 UTC+2, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>> >>>> Correct, I meant Java7 (not Java8). >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 4:18:32 PM UTC+2, Matt Sicker wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I thought the problem was that it required Java 7, not 8. None of the >>>>> pax-logging dependencies require Java 8. >>>>> >>>>> On 6 September 2016 at 09:16, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> We discussed while ago to a Java version change we did on Pax Logging >>>>>> 1.8.x: this version requires Java8 whereas it was supposed to work with >>>>>> Java6 as well. >>>>>> >>>>>> So, what I propose is to release 1.8.6 asap and prepare the rollback >>>>>> of Java8 requirement. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> JB >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 3:31:00 PM UTC+2, [email protected] >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As far as I can see, releasing 1.8.6 can be really quick – and it's >>>>>>> long overdue. It's basically releasing the master branch......... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1.9.0 will be a bit more complicated – as it'll require maven plugin >>>>>>> upgrades and heavy testing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't think we should tackle both things at the same time. There's >>>>>>> not even a branch for 1.9.0, and no work done towards it as far as I >>>>>>> can >>>>>>> see. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you can make the 1.8.6 release today – it will be greatly >>>>>>> appreciated, JB! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 14:52:51 UTC+2, Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm preparing the branches for the two releases: 1.8.6 and 1.9.0 >>>>>>>> (due to the Java version change). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 2:44:00 PM UTC+2, >>>>>>>> [email protected] wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi JB, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Do we have any instructions in the OPS4j community so I can >>>>>>>>> perform the release myself? We really need the 1.8.6 release ASAP! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thank you. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Monday, 20 June 2016 19:10:19 UTC+2, Matt Sicker wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hey, any updates on this? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 6 June 2016 at 17:18, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Even better! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 6 June 2016 at 16:52, <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The OSGi import issues following the Logback 1.1.7 upgrades are >>>>>>>>>>>> now fixed. So please stick with Logback 1.1.7 for the 1.8.6 >>>>>>>>>>>> release. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, 6 June 2016 19:41:06 UTC+1, Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Agree, even if I don't like that much, it makes sense. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 8:36:51 PM UTC+2, Matt Sicker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So should we stick with Logback 1.1.2 and Log4j 2.3 for the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8.x release? That makes the most sense. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6 June 2016 at 13:31, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the update. I'm busy with Karaf 3.0.7 (and other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karaf subprojects) release preparation. I will tackle >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pax-logging just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 8:29:56 PM UTC+2, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, it turns out that the upgrade from Logback 1.1.2 => >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.1.7 was not as easy as I expected. In between, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> developers at Logback >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> introduced dependencies on these additional >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> packages: org.slf4j.event, org.codehaus.groovy.transform. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Obviously the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Groovy one can be marked as optional; I'm checking the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> upstream source to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> understand when and how o.slf4j.event is used. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, 2 June 2016 15:14:26 UTC+1, Matt Sicker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd prefer to downgrade to 2.3 in 1.8.6, then by the time >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we get 1.9.0, log4j 2.6.1 should be released. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2 June 2016 at 08:46, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Basically, we want to avoid to break backward compability >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on minor version. It's unfortunately what we did in 1.8.6. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, we have to: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Or downgrade to log4j 2.3 to still support Java 6 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Or remove log4j 2 support in pax-logging 1.8.x, and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> create new major branch 1.9 with log4j 2 support. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, June 2, 2016 at 3:43:05 PM UTC+2, Matt >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sicker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wait, do you want Java 6 or 7 compatibility in 1.8.6? If >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's 6, we can downgrade log4j to 2.3. If it's 7, then it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be the latest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1 June 2016 at 23:12, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The purpose is: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - remove log4j2 support in pax-logging 1.8.6 and go >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> back to Java7 compatibility >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - release pax-logging 1.9.0 with log4j2 and Java8 only >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compliant >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 8:28:40 PM UTC+2, Matt >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sicker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Same for upgrading log4j to 2.6. Should get it all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> done in a single release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1 June 2016 at 12:08, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yes, it's on my TODO for next week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 7:00:30 PM UTC+2, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey awesome people, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just upgraded Logback from 1.1.2 to 1.1.7 in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master. Would it be possible to make a release of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pax-logging 1.8.6? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Raúl. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emails from it, send an email to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emails from it, send an email to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from it, send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from it, send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from >>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>> -- >>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>> -- -- ------------------ OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
