Hi all, I am also user of this list and let me add my two cents. To tell the truth, I don't understand how the developers of pax-web set priorities for the issues.
I did report about the problem https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXWEB-760 How important is this problem - this problem doesn't let update bundle of the site which is in production. This is core functionality as it is used constantly. In our company it would be issue number one - there is nothing more important then core functionality. For example - if you develop a text editor and it can't save files you don't think about button hover animation. Could anyone explain what principles are followed when next issues are chosen. Is there some roadmap of the project? I already asked about plans but unfortunately didn't get any answers. Best regards -- -- ------------------ OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
