Welcome to OPS4J, Sascha! first of all, great move (from jboss to karaf)!
Thank you for already for your contribution to pax-jdbc. The new adapter alone would be good for a 0.10 release. About Christians changes, can you point out where you outline a migration scenario in a release article/wiki? If so, i think it would make sense to cut a 0.10.0 release and make that the starting point of a potential 1.0.0 later. wdyt? Toni *Toni Menzel* *www.rebaze.de <http://www.rebaze.de/> | www.rebaze.com <http://www.rebaze.com/> | @rebazeio <https://twitter.com/rebazeio>* On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Christian Schneider < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Sascha, > > welcome to ops4j. Great to have you in this community. > > One thing to note about pax-jdbc on master is that I changed the way the > pooling support works. > For pax-jdbc up to version 0.9.0 the pooling created additional > DataSourceFactory services. We got a lot of feedback by users that > this is quite confusing and also hard to understand if it does not work. > The new pooling now offers a PoolingDataSourceFactory service which is > then used by the config module to create the fully enabled DataSource. > > This approach should be much easier for users but it requires a change in > the user configs. So it is an incompatible change. We also need to reflect > this in the documentation. > Are there any best practices how we can have the old and new documentation > beside each other as some people will still use the older versions? > > As pax-jdbc has matured quite a lot anyway I wonder if that would be a > good reason to release a 1.0.0 version. Of course that requires some extra > reviews to make sure we get the > API right. > > Christian > > On 03.11.2016 10:26, Sascha Vogt wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> last week I contributed a pax-jdbc adapter for jtds and Achim convinced >> me to join the project as a comitter. I thought it would be a good idea >> to introduce myself a bit. >> >> I'm a thirty-<mumble> year old developer located in south-west Germany >> (near Karlsruhe) and work for the SEEBURGER AG (mainly working in the >> area of B2B integration solutions as well as EAI). SEEBURGER produces on >> premise software. We recently started migrating our core product >> platform from JBoss (7.1) to Karaf and that's how we also ended up using >> pax-jdbc (and other OPS4j libraries). >> >> Now back to topic: Yesterday I also updated and merged another jdbc >> adapter (for HSQLDB) and closed an invalid issue. So I wanted to ask how >> about a 0.10.0 release (There was a regression fixed, which still waits >> on a release as well, see >> https://ops4j1.jira.com/projects/PAXJDBC/issues/PAXJDBC-105) >> >> Are there any objections to a release? Is there something that should go >> into a 0.10.0 before releasing it? Would anyone of the existing >> committers be willing to do the release or should I request an account >> for publishing myself? (I currently do not have an account at Sonatypes >> OSS Nexus). >> >> Greetings >> -Sascha- >> >> > > -- > Christian Schneider > http://www.liquid-reality.de > > Open Source Architect > http://www.talend.com > > > -- > -- > ------------------ > OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] > > --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "OPS4J" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- ------------------ OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
