On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < [email protected]> wrote: > No objection for a 0.10.0 release. > On the other hand, I think we can consider 1.0.0 release after a 0.11.0.
I think it would be great to figure out if there are any "breaking changes" needed. If not, it has been >4years since Pax JDBC saw the light of day, and I think it is time for a 1.0 release, and that there is no need to wait until "after a 0.11.0". Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java -- -- ------------------ OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
