Hi and thank you Achim :)

I have filed https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.exam2/pull/66 which has the 
Jira reference in the PR title.

The solution was split into three commits with the Jira reference in the last 
commit that actually implemented the desired feature. I can edit the PR if you 
like, perhaps add the Jira reference to the other two commit messages or squash 
them into a single commit?

Cheers,
Arunan


From: 'Achim Nierbeck' via OPS4J [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 10 May 2017 12:10
To: [email protected]
Cc: Michael Vorburger <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [pax-exam] Release a 4.10.1 or 4.11.0 now or when?

Hi Arunan, 

I just added you to the jira :) 
welcome aboard. 
Regarding the Pull-Request, could you please make sure they reference the JIRA 
number, so it's possible to match the PR / git commit with the corresponding 
Jira entry. 

regards, Achim 

2017-05-10 11:28 GMT+02:00 <[email protected]>:


Hi Michael,

we are in the middle of porting our stack to Karaf 4.1.1 and would like to get 
two patches upstreamed into pax exam if possible; I've not yet got access to 
the OPS4J Jira to update 815.

https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-723 - my colleague put up a patch 
https://github.com/NetNow/org.ops4j.pax.exam2/commit/5dc57cb012306b5df53b98680b67c34a9b4d47d2?diff=unified
 that I think got lost in the noise. The title of the ticket suggests a 
breaking change to the feature, but the suggested patch has an opt-in option 
instead.
https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-815 - there is a branch at 
https://github.com/NetNow/org.ops4j.pax.exam2/tree/configure-karaf-logging-by-backend
 which has allowed me to get logging from the console when using log4j2.

These would be handy for us. I also think that more and more people are going 
to hit 815 as they move to Karaf 4.1.x versions, since it uses log4j2. I would 
be happy to action any feedback regarding these two patches in order to get 
them merged and released.

Regards,
Arunan



On Monday, May 8, 2017 at 2:41:02 PM UTC+1, Michael Vorburger wrote:
Hello,

In order to be able to benefit from https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-740 
in a downstream project, I would be interested in a Pax Exam release some time. 
It's not super urgent, but was hoping for maybe the next week or two.. if this 
fits with other ongoing issues on 
https://ops4j1.jira.com/projects/PAXEXAM?selectedItem=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:release-page&status=unreleased
 - what are your plans?

Or can I go ahead and just push a pax exam to central as-is now? Latest 
published is 4.10.0, so shall we have a 4.10.1 next, as there seem to be only 4 
small fixes since the 4.10.0. That would be in line with the current 
4.10.1-SNAPSHOT in the pom.xml of master .. or do you instead want us to bump 
master to 4.11.0-SNAPSHOT now, to be in line with JIRA 
https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-812 and 
https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-740? 

FYI I just looked around JIRA, have closed the confusing 
https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-805, and don't see anything else in 
progress for (4.10.1 or) 4.11.0.

BTW in JIRA there are currently 4 open versions (4.11.0, 4.x, 5.0.0 and 
unscheduled; but no 4.10.1), so prior to a release perhaps the open 4.x issues 
should perhaps be moved to no version (unscheduled?), and 4.x closed, to avoid 
confusion?

Tx,
M.
-- 
-- 
------------------
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected]

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




-- 

Apache Member
Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & 
Project Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>

Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master 

-- 
-- 
------------------
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected]

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google 
Groups "OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ops4j/UzQyEFfKv7o/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
-- 
------------------
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected]

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to