This is now up for review at 
https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.exam2/pull/68



On Friday, May 12, 2017 at 6:28:09 PM UTC+1, Arunan Balasubramaniam wrote:
>
>  
>
>  
>
> Hi,
>
>  
>
> I owe my colleague an apology as the commit he pushed for PAXEXAM-723 was 
> only meant for discussion rather than merging; I got the wrong end of the 
> stick.
>
>  
>
> We have looked at it again though and are working on a mergable solution 
> at 
> https://github.com/NetNow/org.ops4j.pax.exam2/tree/paxexam-723-with-features 
> which hopefully will be ready for review on Monday. The method seems to 
> work with a quick test, but we will test further and write integration 
> tests for it.
>
>  
>
> Cheers,
>
> Arunan
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
> *From:* 'Achim Nierbeck' via OPS4J [mailto:[email protected]] 
> *Sent:* 10 May 2017 12:10
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Cc:* Michael Vorburger <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Re: [pax-exam] Release a 4.10.1 or 4.11.0 now or when?
>
>  
>
> Hi Arunan, 
>
>  
>
> I just added you to the jira :) 
> welcome aboard. 
>
> Regarding the Pull-Request, could you please make sure they reference the 
> JIRA number, so it's possible to match the PR / git commit with the 
> corresponding Jira entry. 
>
>  
>
> regards, Achim 
>
>  
>
> 2017-05-10 11:28 GMT+02:00 <[email protected]>:
>
>
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> we are in the middle of porting our stack to Karaf 4.1.1 and would like to 
> get two patches upstreamed into pax exam if possible; I've not yet got 
> access to the OPS4J Jira to update 815.
>
> https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-723 - my colleague put up a patch 
> https://github.com/NetNow/org.ops4j.pax.exam2/commit/5dc57cb012306b5df53b98680b67c34a9b4d47d2?diff=unified
>  
> that I think got lost in the noise. The title of the ticket suggests a 
> breaking change to the feature, but the suggested patch has an opt-in 
> option instead.
> https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-815 - there is a branch at 
> https://github.com/NetNow/org.ops4j.pax.exam2/tree/configure-karaf-logging-by-backend
>  
> which has allowed me to get logging from the console when using log4j2.
>
> These would be handy for us. I also think that more and more people are 
> going to hit 815 as they move to Karaf 4.1.x versions, since it uses 
> log4j2. I would be happy to action any feedback regarding these two patches 
> in order to get them merged and released.
>
> Regards,
> Arunan
>
>
>
>
> On Monday, May 8, 2017 at 2:41:02 PM UTC+1, Michael Vorburger wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> In order to be able to benefit from 
> https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-740 in a downstream project, I 
> would be interested in a Pax Exam release some time. It's not super urgent, 
> but was hoping for maybe the next week or two.. if this fits with other 
> ongoing issues on 
> https://ops4j1.jira.com/projects/PAXEXAM?selectedItem=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:release-page&status=unreleased
>  
> - what are your plans?
>
> Or can I go ahead and just push a pax exam to central as-is now? Latest 
> published is 4.10.0, so shall we have a 4.10.1 next, as there seem to be 
> only 4 small fixes since the 4.10.0. That would be in line with the current 
> 4.10.1-SNAPSHOT in the pom.xml of master .. or do you instead want us to 
> bump master to 4.11.0-SNAPSHOT now, to be in line with JIRA 
> https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-812 and 
> https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-740? 
>
> FYI I just looked around JIRA, have closed the confusing 
> https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-805, and don't see anything else 
> in progress for (4.10.1 or) 4.11.0.
>
> BTW in JIRA there are currently 4 open versions (4.11.0, 4.x, 5.0.0 and 
> unscheduled; but no 4.10.1), so prior to a release perhaps the open 4.x 
> issues should perhaps be moved to no version (unscheduled?), and 4.x 
> closed, to avoid confusion?
>
> Tx,
> M.
>
> -- 
> -- 
> ------------------
> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected]
>
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "OPS4J" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>
>  
>
> -- 
>
>
> Apache Member
>
> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & 
> Project Lead
> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>
> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
>
>  
>
> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master 
>
>  
>
> -- 
> -- 
> ------------------
> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected]
>
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
> Google Groups "OPS4J" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ops4j/UzQyEFfKv7o/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
------------------
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected]

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to