Hi,

I released the two tipi versions. I also updated the 7.2.x branch and 
created a pull request for the 7.3.x branch. In order to achieve this, I 
had to update some integration tests (mainly timing and dependency issues) 
to get the tomcat integration tests working both with the old and the 
updated tomcat version.

I am a bit unsure how to proceed with the master and the 
master-improvements branch. The master branch does not seem very active to 
me (and is still on tomcat 8.5), the master-improvements branch seems to be 
work in progress. What is the current state of the tests in these branches? 
Should I update both of them? If yes, to which Tomcat version should I 
update the master branch, 8.5.56 as 7.2.x?

Best regards
Stephan


Am Dienstag, 23. Juni 2020 16:03:22 UTC+2 schrieb Grzegorz Grzybek:
>
> Hello
>
>
>    - Tomcat 8 update requires tipi release.
>    - Pax Web 7.3.x already uses Tomcat 9 (I've released the tipi 
>    packages, based (as of pax web 7.3.7) 9.0.16 - remember, 7.3.x is the 
> "tech 
>    preview release" with Servlet API 4 == Tomcat 9, Undertow 2 and 
>    unfortunately same Jetty 9 (because Jetty 10 will be Servlet API 4, but at 
>    the same time, it switches to jakarta.* packages....)
>    - Pax Web 8 will use latest Tomcat 9 and get rid of tipi packages 
>    (Tomcat jars will be exported from pax-web-tomcat and 
> pax-web-tomcat-common 
>    bundles (the latter is new)).
>
> regards
> Grzegorz Grzybek
>
> wt., 23 cze 2020 o 15:46 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> napisał(a):
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It sounds good. Tomcat 8.x should be easy, Tomcat 9 probably needs API 
>> updates.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 9:19 AM Stephan Siano <[email protected] 
>> <javascript:>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> It has been quite a while since the Tomcat version was updated in 
>>> Pax-Web. The 7.2.x branch references Tomcat 8.5.32 and the 3.x and master 
>>> branches references Tomcat 9.0.16.
>>>
>>> These versions are from June 2018 and February 2019, so I think we 
>>> should update to more recent versions 8.5.56 and 9.0.36.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Stephan
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> -- 
>>> ------------------
>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] <javascript:>
>>>
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/e532dfc0-9e4a-40ad-b427-3c28130e4a36o%40googlegroups.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/e532dfc0-9e4a-40ad-b427-3c28130e4a36o%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> -- 
>> -- 
>> ------------------
>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] <javascript:>
>>
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "OPS4J" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAB8EV3Th0_sAKCEDpRWmfT%3DxCdiENqw0yyXGvqEd2mnXVhYyJA%40mail.gmail.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAB8EV3Th0_sAKCEDpRWmfT%3DxCdiENqw0yyXGvqEd2mnXVhYyJA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
-- 
------------------
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected]

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/f38c4072-1558-40c7-aade-8d851a5b6febo%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to