Hello wt., 7 lip 2020 o 13:32 Serge Huber <[email protected]> napisał(a):
> Hi guys, > > Just a quick question: what's the use case for the support of Tomcat and > Undertow? > Tomcat and Undertow were supported in Pax Web for long time - that's just Pax Web benefit over plain HttpService/Whiteboard implementation. regards Grzegorz Grzybek > > Just wondering if it would be possible to focus on Jetty? > > Regards, > Serge... > Serge Huber > CTO & Co-Founder > T +41 22 361 3424 > 9 route des Jeunes | 1227 Acacias | Switzerland > jahia.com <http://www.jahia.com/> > SKYPE | LINKEDIN <https://www.linkedin.com/in/sergehuber> | TWITTER > <https://twitter.com/sergehuber> | VCARD > <http://www.jahia.com/vcard/HuberSerge.vcf> > > > > JOIN OUR COMMUNITY <http://www.jahia.com/> to evaluate, get trained and > to discover why Jahia is a leading User Experience Platform (UXP) for > Digital Transformation. > > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 7:41 AM Grzegorz Grzybek <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello >> >> The current state of pax-web, master-improvements branch is that I've >> successfully got rid of pax-tipi tomcat libraries. Sure - Tomcat libraries >> are not OSGi bundles, but I did something to make maintenance easier. >> pax-web simply re-exports all Tomcat packages explicitly by embedding >> necessary Tomcat libraries. >> Even more - there are: >> - pax-web-tomcat-common - exports packages from tomcat-api, tomcat-util, >> tomcat-util-scan and selected packages from tomcat-embed-core >> - pax-web-tomcat - exports the rest >> >> Why two bundles? Because pax-web-jsp (Jasper) heavily depends on some >> Tomcat packages and we need pax-web-jsp also with Undertow and Jetty. >> >> Also - Undertow 2.1 dropped OSGi support... See >> https://issues.redhat.com/browse/UNDERTOW-1684, so if we want to have >> Undertow 2.1 at some point (and I think before pax-web 8 goes GA, we'll >> have to because of CVEs not being backported to 2.0) we'll have to >> re-export it anyway from pax-web-undertow. >> >> I think not having TIPI will make it easier to maintain pax-web, because >> it'd be simply a matter of updating Pax Web to use newer upstream, original >> Tomcat version (and soon Undertow 2.1+). >> >> During my PTO last week I worked a lot on resource support in Pax Web 8 >> (master-improvements) - this was very inconsistent and now I use original >> "default servlets" from each runtime, with some tweaks to make the >> consistent - welcome file handling unification was painful, but I did it! >> (trust me - dispatcher.include() with welcome files and default servlet >> mapped to something different than "/" was not an easy task ;). >> >> During my work I've created these (so far) issues: >> - https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/pull/5025 >> - https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/servlet-api/issues/300 >> >> I hope to finish my refactoring before summer ends ;) >> >> But fortunately, now master-improvements branch is in a state where I >> don't plan huge refactorings - I'm now mowing integration tests to new >> place (so I know what's working and what doesn't) and if you have time, >> I'll be happy to get some help here ;) >> >> kind regards >> Grzegorz Grzybek >> >> wt., 7 lip 2020 o 06:51 Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >> [email protected]> napisał(a): >> >>> Hi Stephan, >>> >>> Thanks for the update. >>> >>> A side topic we already discussed a bit with Greg is about the effort to >>> have more "isolated" bundles for jetty, tomcat and undertow. Today, we are >>> suffering a lot to maintain at same level the Pax Web API with the three >>> containers. Clearly some methods of the API are mostly Jetty related and >>> not easy to implement with other containers. >>> So, I wonder at some point if we should not have pure httpService impl >>> at a high level, and a specific service/API for each container. >>> >>> It would allow us to simplify a lot Pax Web and move forward faster. >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 4:28 PM Stephan Siano <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I released the two tipi versions. I also updated the 7.2.x branch and >>>> created a pull request for the 7.3.x branch. In order to achieve this, I >>>> had to update some integration tests (mainly timing and dependency issues) >>>> to get the tomcat integration tests working both with the old and the >>>> updated tomcat version. >>>> >>>> I am a bit unsure how to proceed with the master and the >>>> master-improvements branch. The master branch does not seem very active to >>>> me (and is still on tomcat 8.5), the master-improvements branch seems to be >>>> work in progress. What is the current state of the tests in these branches? >>>> Should I update both of them? If yes, to which Tomcat version should I >>>> update the master branch, 8.5.56 as 7.2.x? >>>> >>>> Best regards >>>> Stephan >>>> >>>> >>>> Am Dienstag, 23. Juni 2020 16:03:22 UTC+2 schrieb Grzegorz Grzybek: >>>>> >>>>> Hello >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> - Tomcat 8 update requires tipi release. >>>>> - Pax Web 7.3.x already uses Tomcat 9 (I've released the tipi >>>>> packages, based (as of pax web 7.3.7) 9.0.16 - remember, 7.3.x is the >>>>> "tech >>>>> preview release" with Servlet API 4 == Tomcat 9, Undertow 2 and >>>>> unfortunately same Jetty 9 (because Jetty 10 will be Servlet API 4, >>>>> but at >>>>> the same time, it switches to jakarta.* packages....) >>>>> - Pax Web 8 will use latest Tomcat 9 and get rid of tipi packages >>>>> (Tomcat jars will be exported from pax-web-tomcat and >>>>> pax-web-tomcat-common >>>>> bundles (the latter is new)). >>>>> >>>>> regards >>>>> Grzegorz Grzybek >>>>> >>>>> wt., 23 cze 2020 o 15:46 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >>>>> napisał(a): >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> It sounds good. Tomcat 8.x should be easy, Tomcat 9 probably needs >>>>>> API updates. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> JB >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 9:19 AM Stephan Siano <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It has been quite a while since the Tomcat version was updated in >>>>>>> Pax-Web. The 7.2.x branch references Tomcat 8.5.32 and the 3.x and >>>>>>> master >>>>>>> branches references Tomcat 9.0.16. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> These versions are from June 2018 and February 2019, so I think we >>>>>>> should update to more recent versions 8.5.56 and 9.0.36. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What do you think? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best regards >>>>>>> Stephan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/e532dfc0-9e4a-40ad-b427-3c28130e4a36o%40googlegroups.com >>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/e532dfc0-9e4a-40ad-b427-3c28130e4a36o%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>>> . >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> -- >>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAB8EV3Th0_sAKCEDpRWmfT%3DxCdiENqw0yyXGvqEd2mnXVhYyJA%40mail.gmail.com >>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAB8EV3Th0_sAKCEDpRWmfT%3DxCdiENqw0yyXGvqEd2mnXVhYyJA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> -- >>>> ------------------ >>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] >>>> >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/f38c4072-1558-40c7-aade-8d851a5b6febo%40googlegroups.com >>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/f38c4072-1558-40c7-aade-8d851a5b6febo%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>> . >>>> >>> -- >>> -- >>> ------------------ >>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] >>> >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "OPS4J" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAB8EV3RyUthiGckiCvTzaOZ_EkJmNQ-toJ6nYzBe%3Det6SOztfg%40mail.gmail.com >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAB8EV3RyUthiGckiCvTzaOZ_EkJmNQ-toJ6nYzBe%3Det6SOztfg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >> -- >> -- >> ------------------ >> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "OPS4J" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAAdXmhqWmXUh9onNYwERU1cCOKL3ia%3DwzQ53Z-bq%2BjofAvPqHg%40mail.gmail.com >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAAdXmhqWmXUh9onNYwERU1cCOKL3ia%3DwzQ53Z-bq%2BjofAvPqHg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- > -- > ------------------ > OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "OPS4J" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CACR6SAWt%3DRZL%3DAj%3DZWaDcRmo6-b5u5OQePNRs2ReUEi44sCSLw%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CACR6SAWt%3DRZL%3DAj%3DZWaDcRmo6-b5u5OQePNRs2ReUEi44sCSLw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- -- ------------------ OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected] --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAAdXmhrEnXfMMR%3Dt%3D%3D74OsPPBWZbK_qDcrUeejkPse4MR66Xfg%40mail.gmail.com.
