Sheppy

You should look too at RFC4181 which gives the current guidelines for
writing a MIB module, which is what you would, de facto, be doing.  The
practice has moved on and this RFC will give you some idea of what would
be involved in making even a one word change to a MIB module from an
earlier time:-(

Tom Petch

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sheppy Reno" <[email protected]>
To: "Melinda Shore" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 5:15 PM
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Addition of Available Space to Host-Resources-MIB


On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Melinda Shore
<[email protected]>wrote:

> On 9/11/12 7:48 AM, Sheppy Reno wrote:
> > I’ve been reading through the IETF site a bit, but I’m still not
sure as
> > to the best process to get this implemented.  I was hoping someone
on
> > here could give me some tips on proceeding with this.  From what I
can
> > see, I just need to update RFC2790 with the below information and
> > resubmit.
>
> Probably the best approach would be to write up your proposal in the
> form of an internet draft describing the problem you're encountering,
> your proposal, and the rationale for your proposal.
> Melinda
>


Melinda,
Thanks for the prompt response.  My issues arise from not knowing how to
properly submit this as an internet draft.
http://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/1id-guidelines.html seems to be more geared
towards new drafts than to updates for current RFCs.  From the
information
on that page I would assume that the proper way to proceed would be to
modify RFC2790, add in the Internet Draft comments in the header, remove
anything mentioning RFC, etc.  I'm just worried because this seems like
a
counterintuitive approach to submitting a modification.

Is there a process by which I just submit the changes instead of
rebuilding
the entire RFC this is based on?  I don't mind doing the extra work if a
complete rewrite of the original RFC is required, but I want to make
sure
I'm making the submission properly.
Thanks,
Sheppy



------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------


> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
>


_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to