Hi -

To make what the other folks have been saying more concrete:

Submit an internet draft.  The draft would contain a MIB module.
That MIB module would contain two definitions.  The first would
be for a "conceptual row" containing a single object (which you
defined as "hrStorageAvail" below) with an AUGMENTS clause
referring to the base conceptual row in the Host Resources MIB.
The second would be the definition you proposed below.

Including boilerplate and your explanation of the rationale, the
whole thing should weigh in at about seven pages.

Randy

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sheppy Reno" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 8:48 AM
Subject: [OPSAWG] Addition of Available Space to Host-Resources-MIB


After working with SNMP for quite a while we’ve repeatedly run into issues
where monitoring software is unable to accurately determine the utilization
of volumes on some Linux partitions due to regular processes being unable
to access the reserved file space.  I believe that the best way to correct
this issue is to include an additional data point in the Host Resources MIB
(RFC2790) that will return available space.  This should have no negative
impact on systems that do not utilization reserved space, but will allow
for a much more accurate picture of the space that is truly available on
those partitions using reserved space.



I’ve been reading through the IETF site a bit, but I’m still not sure as to
the best process to get this implemented.  I was hoping someone on here
could give me some tips on proceeding with this.  From what I can see, I
just need to update RFC2790 with the below information and resubmit.



RFC 2790



Add:



hrStorageAvail OBJECT-TYPE

                SYNTAX                Integer32 (0..2147483647)

                MAX-ACCESS     read-only

                STATUS                current

                DESCRIPTION

                                “The amount of the storage represented by
this entry

                                that is available to non-superusers, in
units of

                                hrStorageAllocationUnits.”

                ::= { hrStorageEntry 8 }





Thanks,

Sheppy Reno



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
>


_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to