On 19/02/2013 09:03, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 19/02/2013 05:39, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) wrote:
Hi Joel,
I think this is a good point. We had few discussions with Fred Baker as
well on this aspect. RFC-2804 was written 13 years back, many things have
changed since then.
The IETF's policy has not changed since then. The arguments we went through
in 1999/2000 have not changed since then.
The policy is quite short, but to extract two key points:
The IETF has decided not to consider requirements for wiretapping as
part of the process for creating and maintaining IETF standards.
- On the other hand, the IETF believes that mechanisms designed to
facilitate or enable wiretapping, or methods of using other
facilities for such purposes, should be openly described,
An example of the latter is RFC 3924. You can describe a solution, but
the IETF will not standardise it.
Correct.
Regards, Benoit
Brian
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
