>> >> The new protocol is a straightforward adaptation of the protocols >> HMAC-MD5-96 and HMAC-SHA-96 from RFC 3414 to the SHA-256 based HMAC >> with truncation to 128 bits. Comments and suggestions are welcome. > > Would it be valuable to also add SHA-512? > > We actually implemented all 4 bit lengths of SHA2. I think that's overkill. > But 512 might be valuable. >
HMAC-SHA-256-128 already provides a very high level of security. So I'm not sure if a SHA-512-based HMAC is really needed. The next thing I'm going to do is to write down the MIB spec. As soon as I find time for it... -- Johannes _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
