Hi Bert, thank you for your kind review. See below.
Cheers, Mehmet > -----Original Message----- > From: OPSAWG [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ext Bert Wijnen > (IETF) > Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 9:55 AM > To: opsawg >> "[email protected]" > Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Call for reviewers of draft-ersue-opsawg-coman-* > > My review of the coman documents. > > I am not well versed in these spaces, so take that into account. > > Reading the use cases I got a bit annoyed by the military discussion. > I am a pacifist, so don't really want to review/discuss military needs > or requirements. Oh well.... > > I am also not very familiar with the uses cases of intelligent meters, > factory automation/monitoring, health care devices monitoring and being > remotely managed. > It is interesting reading, and I learned a lot, but I cannot evaluate > if they represent real scenarios or are detailed anough. Also can I not > evaluate if they are exhaustive. > > So I focused on the requirements. > Good list of requirements to start with I think. I have some questions: > > - for requirement 4.2.0001 > I wonder why a C0 device would have to implement in a modular fashion. > I could see that a C0 device (Maybe even C1) does the minimal > modular-function-set implementation, but that the impleementation is in > fact monolythic. It often save memory and possibly cpu cycles. I wonder how you define the "minimal modular-function-set". Isn't this already a decision? The draft avoids defining function sets to be used. I assume different vendors will provide different monolithic devices. > > - for requirement 4.9.001 > It might be good to add a refereence to RFC2914 ?? > Just thinking aloud. Yes, RFC2914 is indeed interesting reference to add. > > - for requirement 4.9.003 > is that more or less an "implementation" suggestion for requirement > 4.9.001 ?? You are right. It could be seen as such. However, there might be different reasons why people would want to reduce the amount of traffic in the network. Congestion is one of them. One can also begin acting before congestion happens. WDYT? > > See you all in the neaw year, which I hope is prosperous for you all. > See you!!! Happy New Year!! Cheers, Mehmet > > Bert > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
