And a gentle reminder… There was some discussion on this draft at the matting, so it looks like we have some interest — thanks to Dan for volunteering[0], but we won’t be able to work on this though without some more folk committing to review.
W [0]: As he is an author we probably cannot count him towards the required number of reviewers… On Dec 4, 2013, at 11:49 AM, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Hopefully you all had a good Thanksgiving -- if you are in the US, hopefully > you had good turkey, stuffing / whatever. > If you are not US based, hopefully you enjoyed the decrease in email volume > while everyone recovered form eating too much. :-) > > One of the action items from Vancouver was for us to call for reviewers for: > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ersue-opsawg-coman-probstate-reqs/ > and > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ersue-opsawg-coman-use-cases/ > > So, can we get some volunteers please? According to our new guidelines we > require sufficient reviewers before adopting new work. > > The documents are (IMO) interesting and easy to read. Constrained devices > have some interesting requirements and limitations. > If you would like a quick reminder / refresher from the meeting, slides are > here: http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/88/slides/slides-88-opsawg-11.pdf > > Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]> indicated that > one of his Ph.D. students had read the draft a couple of weeks ago. So they > just have to review the changes to the latest version. > > > W > -- > "I think it would be a good idea." > - Mahatma Ghandi, when asked what he thought of Western civilization > > > ------- Tsort's Constant: 1.67563, or precisely 1,237.98712567 times the difference between the distance to the sun and the weight of a small orange. -- Terry Pratchett, "The Light Fantastic" (slightly modified) _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
