My review of the coman documents. I am not well versed in these spaces, so take that into account.
Reading the use cases I got a bit annoyed by the military discussion. I am a pacifist, so don't really want to review/discuss military needs or requirements. Oh well.... I am also not very familiar with the uses cases of intelligent meters, factory automation/monitoring, health care devices monitoring and being remotely managed. It is interesting reading, and I learned a lot, but I cannot evaluate if they represent real scenarios or are detailed anough. Also can I not evaluate if they are exhaustive. So I focused on the requirements. Good list of requirements to start with I think. I have some questions: - for requirement 4.2.0001 I wonder why a C0 device would have to implement in a modular fashion. I could see that a C0 device (Maybe even C1) does the minimal modular-function-set implementation, but that the impleementation is in fact monolythic. It often save memory and possibly cpu cycles. - for requirement 4.9.001 It might be good to add a refereence to RFC2914 ?? Just thinking aloud. - for requirement 4.9.003 is that more or less an "implementation" suggestion for requirement 4.9.001 ?? See you all in the neaw year, which I hope is prosperous for you all. Bert _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
