On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear chairs, > > I think I raised some points during WG last call that should be > addressed and I think others supported this. So I would assume that a > revised I-D is needed first before this goes to the IESG.
Yup. Status in the datatracker is marked as: Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WGLC I can still write up the shepherd report (it's not likely to change much), but we'll not submit till the draft has been revised. > > What about producing the writeup of the VMM-MIB in the meantime, which > has passed WG last call as announced on Feb 18th. > Yup, Scott is handling that one. W > /js > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 11:47:41AM -0500, Warren Kumari wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Dear OpsAWG WG, >> > >> > The authors of draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-03 have indicated >> > that they believe that the document is ready, and have asked for >> > Working Group Last Call. >> > The draft is available here: >> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-03/ >> > >> > Please review this draft to see if you think it is ready for >> > publication and send comments to the list, clearly stating your view. >> > >> > This document has already received significant review during adoption, >> > etc. and so reviewing it should not be a large hardship. We'd like at >> > **least** 5 regular WG participants to chime in saying that they >> > support the document. >> > >> > >> > This WGLC ends Fri 06-Mar-2015. >> >> >> Dear everyone, >> >> Thanks for participating -- we see consensus for publication. >> I will write up the shepherd report shortly. >> W >> >> >> > >> > >> > In addition, to satisfy RFC 6702 ("Promoting Compliance with >> > Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)"): >> > Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to >> > draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-03? If so, has this IPR been >> > disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, >> > 3669, and 5378 for more details.) >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Warren Kumari >> > (as OpsAWG WG co-chair) >> > >> > -- >> > I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad >> > idea in the first place. >> > This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing >> > regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair >> > of pants. >> > ---maf >> >> >> >> -- >> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad >> idea in the first place. >> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing >> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair >> of pants. >> ---maf >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OPSAWG mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
