I have reviewed the document and I think it is ready for publication. We have also implemented it (using private OIDs for now).
-David Reid > Dear OpsAWG WG, > > The authors of draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-03 have indicated > that they believe that the document is ready, and have asked for > Working Group Last Call. > The draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-03/ > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is ready for > publication and send comments to the list, clearly stating your view. > > This document has already received significant review during adoption, > etc. and so reviewing it should not be a large hardship. We'd like at > **least** 5 regular WG participants to chime in saying that they > support the document. > > > This WGLC ends Fri 06-Mar-2015. > > > In addition, to satisfy RFC 6702 ("Promoting Compliance with > Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)"): > Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to > draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-03? If so, has this IPR been > disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, > 3669, and 5378 for more details.) > > Thanks, > Warren Kumari > (as OpsAWG WG co-chair) > > -- > I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad > idea in the first place. > This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing > regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair > of pants. > ---maf > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg > _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
