Dear chairs, I think I raised some points during WG last call that should be addressed and I think others supported this. So I would assume that a revised I-D is needed first before this goes to the IESG.
What about producing the writeup of the VMM-MIB in the meantime, which has passed WG last call as announced on Feb 18th. /js On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 11:47:41AM -0500, Warren Kumari wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear OpsAWG WG, > > > > The authors of draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-03 have indicated > > that they believe that the document is ready, and have asked for > > Working Group Last Call. > > The draft is available here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-03/ > > > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is ready for > > publication and send comments to the list, clearly stating your view. > > > > This document has already received significant review during adoption, > > etc. and so reviewing it should not be a large hardship. We'd like at > > **least** 5 regular WG participants to chime in saying that they > > support the document. > > > > > > This WGLC ends Fri 06-Mar-2015. > > > Dear everyone, > > Thanks for participating -- we see consensus for publication. > I will write up the shepherd report shortly. > W > > > > > > > > In addition, to satisfy RFC 6702 ("Promoting Compliance with > > Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)"): > > Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to > > draft-ietf-opsawg-hmac-sha-2-usm-snmp-03? If so, has this IPR been > > disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, > > 3669, and 5378 for more details.) > > > > Thanks, > > Warren Kumari > > (as OpsAWG WG co-chair) > > > > -- > > I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad > > idea in the first place. > > This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing > > regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair > > of pants. > > ---maf > > > > -- > I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad > idea in the first place. > This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing > regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair > of pants. > ---maf > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
