On Feb 9, 2016, at 4:01 PM, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > As would the chairs... and I'm assuming any security conscious network > engineer. > Please review and provide feedback...
I have a number of comments. The main question is how, exactly this document became adopted as a WG document. I've gone through my inbox and the web archive, and I don't see any call for WG adoption. Just a notice that the document was accepted as a WG document. I have *major* problems with the document as an IETF standard. We already have two AAA IETF protocols. Standardizing a third one is, in my opinion, entirely outside of the purview of OPSAWG. There are a host of procedural problems with how the document was adopted. I suggest that the document be withdrawn, and re-submitted as an individual draft. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
