On Feb 10, 2016, at 3:31 PM, Alan DeKok <[email protected]> wrote: > There are a host of procedural problems with how the document was adopted. > I suggest that the document be withdrawn, and re-submitted as an individual > draft.
To be clear: 1. the document never had a WG call for adoption as required in Section 4.2.1 of RFC 6174 2. the charter has not been updated to reflect this work. 3. the charter says: "All new work items and rechartering proposals will be brought for approval with the IESG." 4. I can find no record of this approval taking place. If it had taken place, the charter would have been updated. 5. I had objected to this in person at the OPSAWG meeting in IETF 94. However, the web site shows no minutes from that meeting: https://tools.ietf.org/wg/opsawg/minutes 6. I believe that this document is an incorrect technical choice as per section 6.5.1 of RFC 2016. As such, I ask the chairs to withdraw the document as a WG document until such time as the procedural issues above have been addressed. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
