On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:37 PM, Alan DeKok <[email protected]> wrote:
> TACACS+ has 100% functionality overlap with RADIUS.

you keep saying this, but I can't get a radius server to authorize my
command on a network device in my network... you seem absolutely sure,
but I'm absolutely sure (because I've driven down this road a few
times with 4 different vendors if IP gear and 3 different optical
vendors) you are incorrect.

I think you are very much in the rough, and I'm not clear on why you
are as vigorous about this. There are network operators on this list
and in the rest of the world that have said: "tac+ is how I AAA my
network gear, I need it to be improved/worked-on/etc, please do that
for me"

also: "I support this draft, and want to see it complete the IETF
process... so I can then start having better security of the
management of my global network elements."

-chris

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to