Some corrections. On Feb 12, 2016, at 11:46 AM, Bradner, Scott <[email protected]> wrote: > The topics of the appeal and other messages from Mr. DeKok included: > 1/ The adoption of the TACACS+ Internet Draft as a working group item.
My appeal concerned the *process* of adoption as a WG item. > 2/ The appropriateness of publishing the TACACS+ Internet Draft as > a RFC through the IETF track. My comments at the time of the appeal show that I support publishing historical TACACS+ protocol as an informational RFC, via the OPSAWG > 3/ The appropriateness of publishing the TACACS+ Internet Draft as > a standards track RFC. My comments at the time of the appeal show that I support publishing the *changed* (i.e. future) TACACS+ as a standards track RFC. I do not support publishing the historical TACACS+ protocol as a standards track RFC. > 20 July 2015: The ops area session was held. The TACACS+ slides used > during the session are at: > https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/93/slides/slides-93-opsarea-2.pdf > > Minutes of the session are quite sparse. They note that the presentation > occurred and that Alan DeKok objected to the proposal. I don't see copy of the minutes on the WG mailing list archives. They aren't on the WG page at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/opsawg/meetings/ Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
