ps - the session was in the ops area meeting, which is why the minutes are not on the opsawg list
Scott > On Feb 15, 2016, at 5:33 PM, Alan DeKok <[email protected]> wrote: > > Some corrections. > > On Feb 12, 2016, at 11:46 AM, Bradner, Scott <[email protected]> wrote: >> The topics of the appeal and other messages from Mr. DeKok included: >> 1/ The adoption of the TACACS+ Internet Draft as a working group item. > > My appeal concerned the *process* of adoption as a WG item. > >> 2/ The appropriateness of publishing the TACACS+ Internet Draft as >> a RFC through the IETF track. > > My comments at the time of the appeal show that I support publishing > historical TACACS+ protocol as an informational RFC, via the OPSAWG > >> 3/ The appropriateness of publishing the TACACS+ Internet Draft as >> a standards track RFC. > > My comments at the time of the appeal show that I support publishing the > *changed* (i.e. future) TACACS+ as a standards track RFC. > > I do not support publishing the historical TACACS+ protocol as a standards > track RFC. > >> 20 July 2015: The ops area session was held. The TACACS+ slides used >> during the session are at: >> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/93/slides/slides-93-opsarea-2.pdf >> >> Minutes of the session are quite sparse. They note that the presentation >> occurred and that Alan DeKok objected to the proposal. > > I don't see copy of the minutes on the WG mailing list archives. They > aren't on the WG page at: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/opsawg/meetings/ > > Alan DeKok. > _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
