On 2/15/16 3:16 PM, Bradner, Scott wrote:
> ps - the session was in the ops area meeting, which is why the minutes are 
> not on the opsawg list

Joint meetings have the property of occupying one slot. that  may be a
tooling problem but satisfies the proceedings reporting in it's current
form.

> Scott
> 
>> On Feb 15, 2016, at 5:33 PM, Alan DeKok <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>  Some corrections.
>>
>> On Feb 12, 2016, at 11:46 AM, Bradner, Scott <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> The topics of the appeal and other messages from Mr. DeKok included:
>>> 1/ The adoption of the TACACS+ Internet Draft as a working group item.
>>
>>  My appeal concerned the *process* of adoption as a WG item.
>>
>>> 2/ The appropriateness of publishing the TACACS+ Internet Draft as
>>> a RFC through the IETF track.
>>
>>  My comments at the time of the appeal show that I support publishing 
>> historical TACACS+ protocol as an informational RFC, via the OPSAWG
>>
>>> 3/ The appropriateness of publishing the TACACS+ Internet Draft as
>>> a standards track RFC.
>>
>>  My comments at the time of the appeal  show that I support publishing the 
>> *changed* (i.e. future) TACACS+ as a standards track RFC.
>>
>>  I do not support publishing the historical TACACS+ protocol as a standards 
>> track RFC.
>>
>>> 20 July 2015: The ops area session was held. The TACACS+ slides used
>>> during the session are at: 
>>> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/93/slides/slides-93-opsarea-2.pdf
>>>
>>> Minutes of the session are quite sparse.  They note that the presentation
>>> occurred and that Alan DeKok objected to the proposal.
>>
>>  I don't see copy of the minutes on the WG mailing list archives.  They 
>> aren't on the WG page at:
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/opsawg/meetings/
>>
>>  Alan DeKok.
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
> 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to