On 2/18/16 9:02 PM, Andy Bierman wrote: > > I think in order for WG consensus to determine decisions wrt/ this > document, > it would no longer be a Cisco protocol. Cisco would have to give all > change control > authority to the IETF. Maybe an expert on IETF process (like Scott) > can clarify. >
That is the deal, no matter the vendor, when something becomes an IETF standard. And this is why I say, let's see where we land before having to cough up two documents, when one might do just fine. Eliot
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
