Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 18, 2016, at 12:08, Eliot Lear <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 2/18/16 9:02 PM, Andy Bierman wrote: >> >> I think in order for WG consensus to determine decisions wrt/ this >> document, >> it would no longer be a Cisco protocol. Cisco would have to give all >> change control >> authority to the IETF. Maybe an expert on IETF process (like Scott) >> can clarify. > > That is the deal, no matter the vendor, when something becomes an IETF > standard. And this is why I say, let's see where we land before having > to cough up two documents, when one might do just fine. When we say something is adopted by the working group indeed the working group now has change control. Thier is bit of give and take required to bring work here. > > Eliot > > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
