> I think in order for WG consensus to determine decisions wrt/ this > document, it would no longer be a Cisco protocol. Cisco would have to > give all change control authority to the IETF.
andy, you have been around for a while. where did you get the idea it was otherwise in the case of this document? this is just another ietf document. it happens to document a protocol used by many operators on many vendors' equipment. where does all this ipr, proprietary, ... paranoia come from? [ that was a rhetorical question; no need to answer ] randy _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
