Dear OpsAWG: This is the second of three messages [0] to determine what the OpsAWG should do with TACACS+
Should the ID, as presented, or as revised by the WG, be published as one or more RFCs? Scott, Tianran and Warren [0]: The first one was the IPR one ( "Untangling - Explicit call for IPR on draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-00")
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
