There is very little content in the draft (although it does have a very pretty ASCII art drawing), but I'm not sure why OpsAWG and not NFVRG ( https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/nfvrg/charter/) or SDNRG ( https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/sdnrg/charter/) or Netconf ( https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/netconf/charter/)
Those groups seem much more likely... W On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 8:53 AM Hui Deng <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello all > > We have posted a submission this morning, apologize for late submission. > > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-deng-opsawg-nfvrg-sdnrg-openo-00.txt > > OPEN-O would intent to propose an open source project under Linux foundation. > It > includes cross domain orchestrator, SDN-O and NFV-O. SDN-O is > sitting on top of SDN Controller like ODL or ONOS and somewhere > below the SDN APP. NFVO is aligned with ETSI NFV ISG. This document > is seeking for the relationship between open standard IETF and open > source project OPEN-O. > > thanks a lot for your kind review > > Best regards, > > DENG Hui > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg >
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
