Can I treat no reply means "No", thanks a lot for chair's reply, that could save me time to work on useless preparation.
Best regards, DENG Hui 2016-04-05 20:18 GMT-03:00 Hui Deng <[email protected]>: > Hi Warren > > As you said, we do also contact with NFVRG and SDNRG about the draft. > The reason coming to OPSAWG is to discuss about Yang related in OPS Area, > because there are multiple WGs related to this like (NETCONF, NETMOD), > so we approach OPSAWG for the simple way to proceed, > > thanks a lot for your consideration > Best regards, > > DENG Hui > > > > 2016-04-04 20:34 GMT-03:00 Warren Kumari <[email protected]>: > >> There is very little content in the draft (although it does have a very >> pretty ASCII art drawing), but I'm not sure why OpsAWG and not NFVRG ( >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/nfvrg/charter/) or SDNRG ( >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/sdnrg/charter/) or Netconf ( >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/netconf/charter/) >> >> Those groups seem much more likely... >> >> W >> >> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 8:53 AM Hui Deng <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hello all >>> >>> We have posted a submission this morning, apologize for late submission. >>> >>> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-deng-opsawg-nfvrg-sdnrg-openo-00.txt >>> >>> OPEN-O would intent to propose an open source project under Linux >>> foundation. It >>> includes cross domain orchestrator, SDN-O and NFV-O. SDN-O is >>> sitting on top of SDN Controller like ODL or ONOS and somewhere >>> below the SDN APP. NFVO is aligned with ETSI NFV ISG. This document >>> is seeking for the relationship between open standard IETF and open >>> source project OPEN-O. >>> >>> thanks a lot for your kind review >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> DENG Hui >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OPSAWG mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
