Hi, I have a stronger opinion... IMO the IETF is not in the open-source business and has no official role to play in open-source. You should come to the IETF with very specific requests that you want addressed in the standards.
Andy On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 2:45 PM Hui Deng <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Can I treat no reply means "No", thanks a lot for chair's reply, >> that could save me time to work on useless preparation. >> > > It is currently a No. > > The current document has almost no detail. I think the right thing to do > is: > 1: flesh out the document so that there is content / protein. > 2: discuss it in NFVRG / SDNRG, once there is support OpsAWG might be the > place for a yang discussion / how this integrates with other things, etc. > > W > > >> >> Best regards, >> >> DENG Hui >> >> 2016-04-05 20:18 GMT-03:00 Hui Deng <[email protected]>: >> >>> Hi Warren >>> >>> As you said, we do also contact with NFVRG and SDNRG about the draft. >>> The reason coming to OPSAWG is to discuss about Yang related in OPS Area, >>> because there are multiple WGs related to this like (NETCONF, NETMOD), >>> so we approach OPSAWG for the simple way to proceed, >>> >>> thanks a lot for your consideration >>> Best regards, >>> >>> DENG Hui >>> >>> >>> >>> 2016-04-04 20:34 GMT-03:00 Warren Kumari <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> There is very little content in the draft (although it does have a very >>>> pretty ASCII art drawing), but I'm not sure why OpsAWG and not NFVRG ( >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/nfvrg/charter/) or SDNRG ( >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/sdnrg/charter/) or Netconf ( >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/netconf/charter/) >>>> >>>> Those groups seem much more likely... >>>> >>>> W >>>> >>>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 8:53 AM Hui Deng <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello all >>>>> >>>>> We have posted a submission this morning, apologize for late >>>>> submission. >>>>> >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-deng-opsawg-nfvrg-sdnrg-openo-00.txt >>>>> >>>>> OPEN-O would intent to propose an open source project under Linux >>>>> foundation. It >>>>> includes cross domain orchestrator, SDN-O and NFV-O. SDN-O is >>>>> sitting on top of SDN Controller like ODL or ONOS and somewhere >>>>> below the SDN APP. NFVO is aligned with ETSI NFV ISG. This document >>>>> is seeking for the relationship between open standard IETF and open >>>>> source project OPEN-O. >>>>> >>>>> thanks a lot for your kind review >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> >>>>> DENG Hui >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> OPSAWG mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg > >
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
