Thank you for letting us know after we asked, we must be not clear before. We thought the architecture diagram shows some detail and content, maybe different people has different opinion. Anyhow we will try to work in other place first.
thanks a lot for your advice DENG Hui 2016-04-06 15:21 GMT-03:00 Warren Kumari <[email protected]>: > > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 2:45 PM Hui Deng <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Can I treat no reply means "No", thanks a lot for chair's reply, >> that could save me time to work on useless preparation. >> > > It is currently a No. > > The current document has almost no detail. I think the right thing to do > is: > 1: flesh out the document so that there is content / protein. > 2: discuss it in NFVRG / SDNRG, once there is support OpsAWG might be the > place for a yang discussion / how this integrates with other things, etc. > > W > > >> >> Best regards, >> >> DENG Hui >> >> 2016-04-05 20:18 GMT-03:00 Hui Deng <[email protected]>: >> >>> Hi Warren >>> >>> As you said, we do also contact with NFVRG and SDNRG about the draft. >>> The reason coming to OPSAWG is to discuss about Yang related in OPS Area, >>> because there are multiple WGs related to this like (NETCONF, NETMOD), >>> so we approach OPSAWG for the simple way to proceed, >>> >>> thanks a lot for your consideration >>> Best regards, >>> >>> DENG Hui >>> >>> >>> >>> 2016-04-04 20:34 GMT-03:00 Warren Kumari <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> There is very little content in the draft (although it does have a very >>>> pretty ASCII art drawing), but I'm not sure why OpsAWG and not NFVRG ( >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/nfvrg/charter/) or SDNRG ( >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/sdnrg/charter/) or Netconf ( >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/netconf/charter/) >>>> >>>> Those groups seem much more likely... >>>> >>>> W >>>> >>>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 8:53 AM Hui Deng <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello all >>>>> >>>>> We have posted a submission this morning, apologize for late >>>>> submission. >>>>> >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-deng-opsawg-nfvrg-sdnrg-openo-00.txt >>>>> >>>>> OPEN-O would intent to propose an open source project under Linux >>>>> foundation. It >>>>> includes cross domain orchestrator, SDN-O and NFV-O. SDN-O is >>>>> sitting on top of SDN Controller like ODL or ONOS and somewhere >>>>> below the SDN APP. NFVO is aligned with ETSI NFV ISG. This document >>>>> is seeking for the relationship between open standard IETF and open >>>>> source project OPEN-O. >>>>> >>>>> thanks a lot for your kind review >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> >>>>> DENG Hui >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> OPSAWG mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
